Deliverable 03 · Measurement

Did the support system actually move the needle?

Four KPIs, four data sources. Each one ties a measurable outcome back to a part of the workflow or learning blend.

Time-to-proficiency

6 wks

−50% vs baseline

Preceptor sign-off + scenario scores

Mis-triage rate

4.6%

−54% vs baseline

EHR retrospective audit

Workflow consistency

86%

+18 pts vs baseline

Inter-rater ESI agreement study

Learner confidence

8.1 / 10

+2.9 vs baseline

Post-shift pulse survey

Time-to-proficiency

Weeks to independent triage sign-off. Current cohort uses TriageOS; prior cohort did not.

Source · preceptor sign-off log + monthly scenario scores

Error reduction

Mis-triage and documentation error rates, before vs after PSS rollout.

Source · EHR retrospective audit, n=1,420 charts

Workflow consistency

ESI assignment agreement vs gold-standard cases, by nurse and acuity level. ESI 3 is consistently the hardest call.

ESI 1ESI 2ESI 3ESI 4ESI 5
N. Alvarez9892788896
T. Bryant9788728494
S. Chen9690808695
R. Davies9585688092
M. Eze9994829097
L. Fox9486708293
K. Gomez9791768795
J. Huang9689748594

% agreement with gold-standard ESI assignment

Source · quarterly inter-rater reliability study, 40 cases per nurse

Learner confidence

Self-rated confidence across six triage competencies, pre vs post.

Source · pulse survey, n=84 nurses, 10-point scale

What this tells us

  • Faster autonomy: nurses sign off ~6 weeks earlier, freeing preceptor capacity.
  • Safer judgment: under-triage — the most dangerous error — dropped by more than half.
  • Targeted gap: ESI 3 consistency lags. Next iteration adds an ESI 3-specific decision tree.
  • Confidence ≠ competence: we track both, and the gap between them is the early-warning signal.